« A house exhales | Main | Shoveling »
January 23, 2005
Blizzard of '05
I think it might have been best described as a hurricane with snow. Yesterday afternoon, after the conference ended (and while I'm not going to post alot more about the conference either here or at my other blog, suffice it to say I felt quite disenfranchized and disenchanted with the whole experience and process. I'm still not sure if I'm glad I went.) I hustled out to middle Mass to do yet another thesis interview. As I opened my car door to exit at the appointed Starbucks meeting point, the first flakes began to fall. An hour and forty five minutes later when we finally finished the remaining cars in the lot were thoroughly coated.
After a white-knuckle two hour drive back to where I'd started in the Boston area, I was relieved to be home. Even more relieved as the wind broadened and strengthened its howling winds and blowing snow as the night wore on. After the house was pounded with blown snow and tremendous gusts all night, we woke to 18 inches on the ground, and the intense storm raging outside.
I've never been in a storm quite like it. Where I'm from, we get cold and snow and wind and big storms, but never something with the windy ferocity of this enormous scrapy storm. When it was finally over, we had 26 to 28 inches to shovel. We'll never really know how much we got, as much of the snow was blown upto in elaborate and architectural drifts, burying cars, front doors, front steps and front yards.
January 23, 2005 at 09:29 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454523e69e200d8343982b253ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blizzard of '05:
Comments
Is it likely that the thesis would be a venue to present counter-arguments to the things you found disillusioning about the conference? In which case it would be a good thing you went, in that it would show you what ideas you're arguing *against*, as it were?
Posted by: pjm | Jan 24, 2005 10:10:42 AM
More of my problem with the conference were the institutional structures that made me feel silenced, and thus unable to voice my thoughts , namely that I felt that many attendees were making huge assumptions about bloggers motivations based on their own social/cultural/blogging location, rather than really paying attention to what the bulk of people were doing with the technology. I don't care if they want to focus on j-blogging and blogging as news, but at least be explicit that this is only a very very small fraction of the universe of things called "blog."
To be fair, there were people who did bring up some of these issues peripherally, but the threads were never picked up in the discussion.
My thesis is really approaching something qualitatively different that what was being discussed. I certainly will address issues of credibility (but better here thought of as "authenticity.") when I discuss self-presentation in a blog. So in that way I will be able to write my response in the thesis. And I'll also know about the assumptions and generalizations I'll need to be sure to mention and distance myself from when I write the thesis.
Upon reflection, the main issue here for me is that I'm used to being treated as either an equal or an expert in group discussions on topic on which I am knowledgeable, and here I was treated as neither, and that was difficult for me to accept.
Posted by: Ms. Feverish | Jan 24, 2005 10:57:54 AM